Technology – supporting public resilience - Revision history

Antti at 14:40, 19 August 2014

2014-08-19T14:40:48Z

Antti at 15:09, 6 August 2014

2014-08-06T15:09:23Z

Antti at 14:45, 6 August 2014

2014-08-06T14:45:16Z

Antti at 06:35, 22 July 2014

2014-07-22T06:35:04Z

Antti: Antti moved page Technology to Technology – supporting public resilience without leaving a redirect

2014-07-21T13:27:06Z

Antti moved page Technology to Technology – supporting public resilience without leaving a redirect

Antti at 13:11, 21 July 2014

2014-07-21T13:11:25Z

Antti at 08:18, 18 July 2014

2014-07-18T08:18:07Z

Antti: Antti moved page Technology supporting public resilience to Technology without leaving a redirect

2014-07-04T12:58:20Z

Antti moved page Technology supporting public resilience to Technology without leaving a redirect

Antti at 12:57, 4 July 2014

2014-07-04T12:57:06Z

Antti at 10:14, 28 June 2014

2014-06-28T10:14:48Z

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 <h3>Technology – supporting public resilience</h3>
 <ul>
@@ Line 20: / Line 21: @@
 <li>[[Technology – links to more information|Links to more information]]</li>
 </ul>
+</div>

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Personal devices such as mobile phones can further support the targeting of authority notifications and other information by utilizing characteristics such as the location of an individual. In addition, the receiver can decide on preferred apps or subscriptions, and select settings that, for example, take visual impairments into account.
-==More about this topic==
 <ul>
 <li>[[Means to facilitate communication]]</li>
 <li>[[Accessible technology and inclusive design]]</li>
 <li>[[Technology acceptance ]]</li>
 <li>[[Data security, privacy and legal issues]]</li>
 </ul>

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:45, 6 August 2014
Line 16:		Line 16:
	<li>[[Data security, privacy and legal issues]]</li>		<li>[[Data security, privacy and legal issues]]</li>
	</ul>		</ul>
−	~~==Links to more information==~~

−	*Baron, G. (2011). Six steps for building social media into your crisis plan. CW Bulletin, International Association of Business Communicators. San Francisco, CA. Retrievable from: http://www.iabc.com/cwb/archive/2010/0210/Baron.htm
−
−	*Booz Allen Hamilton (2009). Special Report. Expert Round Table on Social media and Risk Communication during Times of Crisis: Strategic Challenges and Opportunities. Retrievable from: http://www.boozallen.com/media/file/Risk_Communications_Times_of_Crisis.pdf
−
−	*Burns , R. & Shanley, L. A. (2013). Connecting Grassroots to Government for Disaster Management: Workshop Summary. Wilson Center. Retrieved 1.8.2013, from http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/STIP_Connecting-Grassroots-Workshop-Summary_Final2.pdf
−
−	*Haataja, M. (2013), Literature review on technology acceptance and innovation diffusion and domain specific acceptance criteria related to crisis communication technologies. Report project PEP, retrievable from: http://www.projectPEP.eu
−
−	*Su, Y.S., Wardell III, C. & Thorkildsen, Z. (2012) Social Media in the Emergency Management Field 2012 Survey Results. Retrieved. 6.6.2013, from http://www.cna.org/sites/default/files/research/SocialMedia_EmergencyManagement.pdf
−
−	*Sullivan, H. (2013), Accessibility and inclusiveness. Report Project PEP, retrievable from: http://www.projectPEP.eu

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 Personal devices such as mobile phones can further support the targeting of authority notifications and other information by utilizing characteristics such as the location of an individual. In addition, the receiver can decide on preferred apps or subscriptions, and select settings that, for example, take visual impairments into account.
-==Further reading==
+==More about this topic==
 <ul>
 <li>[[Means to facilitate communication]]</li>

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:11, 21 July 2014
Line 28:		Line 28:
	*Su, Y.S., Wardell III, C. & Thorkildsen, Z. (2012) Social Media in the Emergency Management Field 2012 Survey Results. Retrieved. 6.6.2013, from http://www.cna.org/sites/default/files/research/SocialMedia_EmergencyManagement.pdf		*Su, Y.S., Wardell III, C. & Thorkildsen, Z. (2012) Social Media in the Emergency Management Field 2012 Survey Results. Retrieved. 6.6.2013, from http://www.cna.org/sites/default/files/research/SocialMedia_EmergencyManagement.pdf

−	*Sullivan, H. (2013), Accessibility and inclusiveness. Report Project PEP, retrievable from: www.projectPEP.eu	+	*Sullivan, H. (2013), Accessibility and inclusiveness. Report Project PEP, retrievable from: http://www.projectPEP.eu

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:27, 21 July 2014
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:18, 18 July 2014
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Personal devices such as mobile phones can further support the targeting of authority notifications and other information by utilizing characteristics such as the location of an individual. In addition, the receiver can decide on preferred apps or subscriptions, and select settings that, for example, take visual impairments into account.		Personal devices such as mobile phones can further support the targeting of authority notifications and other information by utilizing characteristics such as the location of an individual. In addition, the receiver can decide on preferred apps or subscriptions, and select settings that, for example, take visual impairments into account.

		+	==Further reading==
		+	<ul>
		+	<li>[[Means to facilitate communication]]</li>
		+	<li>[[Accessible technology and inclusive design]]</li>
		+	<li>[[Technology acceptance ]]</li>
		+	<li>[[Data security, privacy and legal issues]]</li>
		+	</ul>
	==Links to more information==		==Links to more information==

← Older revision	Revision as of 12:58, 4 July 2014
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:57, 4 July 2014
Line 26:		Line 26:


−	[[Category:Technology ~~supporting public resilience~~]]	+	[[Category:Technology]]
		+	[[Category:PEP]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Introduction==
 In crisis and emergency situations, individuals need information that is correct, clear and understandable. This information should be presented in a timely manner through multiple channels to ensure that as many people as possible affected by an incident are reached. Next in importance to providing information, is communication with citizens. This concerns finding out what their needs are their needs and facilitating their response and cooperation. If public organisations do not take the initiative, the information void will be filled by other actors and sources that may not always be reliable. However, resilience depends on the activities of many organisations and individuals, and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as well as other long-term or ad hoc groups also play an essential role in communication during crises and emergencies.
@@ Line 6: / Line 8: @@
 Social media, websites and smart phone applications provide a direct channel for communication – next to mediated by the news media – between response organisations and citizens –. Technology can help provide the information and resources that citizens needs in emergencies, enable cooperation and empower them to help themselves and their fellows. This supports those affected by the emergency by giving them a sense of control and the ability to cope with the situation. Providing information via various channels, including social media, also assists individuals to connect with each other, share and exchange experiences and possibly assist each other in coping better with a diversity of incidents. Information travels fast within and across social networks.
 Personal devices such as mobile phones can further support the targeting of authority notifications and other information by utilizing characteristics such as the location of an individual. In addition, the receiver can decide on preferred apps or subscriptions, and select settings that, for example, take visual impairments into account.
 [[Category:Technology supporting public resilience]]